Do I see the other
or do I project?
EXPOSE is situated within the field of critical reflection on the gaze, responsibility, and the non-neutrality of perception.
The words that follow are not definitions.
They are shifts in gaze.
I discovered I was calling “objectivity” what was actually habit.
— M.
I realized I wasn’t listening: I was preparing my answer.
— university professor
I thought I was observing an error. I was defending a position.
— A.
I understood that the discomfort I felt was not about the other, but about the image I had built of them.
— researcher
I thought I was describing a fact. I was already judging.
— G.
I realized the word “always” was my way of not seeing.
— L.
I thought I was neutral. I was merely invisibly aligned.
— student
I discovered that what irritated me was something I did not accept in myself.
— S.
I realized I was calling “frankness” what was lack of attention.
— P.
I thought I was looking at a person. I was looking at a role.
— professor
I understood that the other was not who I had decided they were.
— C.
I realized I was not seeing: I was recognizing.
— F.
The conflict changed when I suspended the first interpretation.
— R.
I realized my certainty came from haste.
— D.
I discovered that the image I was defending was my own.
— E.
I thought I was protecting a principle. I was protecting myself.
— anonymous
I saw that the label reassured me more than reality.
— T.
I realized that silence was not absence, but resistance.
— researcher
I understood that truly looking requires more time than I was willing to give.
— V.
It was not the other who changed. It was the way I saw them.
— M.
This is not a testimony about EXPOSE.
It is a shift in gaze.